In
the same week that we are in the final stages of preparing for the start of the
school’s programme, there have been two nationally reported tragedies at
sea. The death of a father and
daughter, and life changing injuries to four other members of their family in a
powerboat accident in Cornwall was followed by the news of the death of a gold
winning Olympic sailor in a high performance multihull yacht preparing for the
America’s Cup. Elsewhere there will have
been numerous other accidents and “near misses” at sea. On the face of it these may have little
relevance to the Swan.
The
relevance is, I suggest, a stark reminder that no matter how much fun or how
professional and prepared you are; there are inherent risks associated with
boats. (But keep it perspective because
there are inherent risks associated with life.)
So rather than these tragedies being a reason to stop going to sea they
are a reminder of the necessity to prepare and plan for the unexpected and not
simply leave things to chance or hoped for good luck. Failing to prepare is preparing to fail and
at sea the stakes are high. An in vogue
saying as I was leaving the Army, coined I believe by the Americans was “hope
is not an acceptable action or measure”.
It
won’t surprise you to learn that commercial sailing is subject to a regulatory
frame work and all vessels and crews required to meet and adhere to a code of
practice. Rather than seeing this as an
onerous bureaucratic hurdle, I choose to see it as an articulation of sound
seamanship and a navigation aid or check list of good practise. After all, in all walks of life, we know that
common sense is not always common practice. At times the code might sometimes appear
pedantic. For example we now have a full
functioning fire fighting capability (following my bath in paraffin!!) in
addition to 4 fire extinguishers, an internal engine room fire fighting system,
two pumps and a fire blanket, we needed to purchase two buckets with lanyards to
complete compliance.
So
how do you prepare for sea and how do you know when you are ready? It’s potentially quite a deep question. Complying with the code is a possible answer but
not one that sits easily with me.
Equally if you take the view that you can always be better prepared then
you might be tempted to say “never” because there is always something else to
do. So there is a judgement to be
made. In this case there is also a
timetable to be adhered to, or if it can’t be then there needs to be a very
good reason.
The
Italian economist, Pareto was studying wealth distribution when he noticed that
80% of Italy’s wealth came from 20% of the population. To his surprise the same ratio appeared again
in a different studies. Intrigued he now
set out to find other examples, which he did in abundance. Today The Pareto or 80-20 principle is a well-recognised
guide. Suppose you are going to repaint
the door. You could burn back to the wood,
prime, undercoat and apply two top coats.
Let’s call that the 100% job.
Alternatively you could rub down, scrap badly damaged areas, spot prime,
spot undercoat and reapply two top coats.
Lets call that the 80% job.
Chances are that you will have an 80% result that only took you 20% of the
time it would have take to do the 100% job.
The question is how important to you in absolute and relative terms is
it to paint the door? Now apply the same
thought process to getting ready for sea.
Clearly there are some jobs where a 100% solution and nothing less will
do, but equally there are some jobs which only merit an 80% solution using 20%
of the time and freeing up time to tackle the 100% jobs. The trick is to identify which is which. In fact apply it to what is important in your
life.
So lets think about preparing for sea. The principle suggests that 20% of the hazards will cause 80% of the injuries, so it makes sense to target those 20% but how do you know which are the 20% to focus on? Well if you had a system of accident and near miss reporting, that might be a good start point, so why not go to the old cutlery draw and have a look? So efficient accident reporting informs efficient accident prevention. A word of caution though, not all accidents have the same consequence. In fact MOB is very unlikely, but very high impact if it does occur, so don’t just use empirical mathematics, temper it with good old common sense.
Scott and I have been completing work in two other vital areas; bungs and Medical 1st aid.
For non-sailors bungs might need some
explanation. Firstly they are nothing
to do with a backhand bribe. Most
vessels will have some through hull fixtures.
For example, our fire pump draws water from the sea through a pipe
intake in the hull, so does the engine cooling system. In fact we have 9 holes through the hull
below the water line. Each of these is
fitted with a seacock (which you might think of as being a big tap). Question: what happens if the seacock
fails? Answer: potential disaster. However a simple conical soft wood bung
banged into the pipe or hole could be a life saver. (common sense let alone the code of practice
require in place measures. )
So measure the size of hole, get a bung made and
tie it in place next to the hole and you will always know where it is and that
you have the right size. Soft wood
because it will swell and seal more effectively than anything else.
When I came aboard I couldn’t find any soft
wood bungs let alone any tied in place.
It was on my must do list and last week during routine maintenance of an
inlet pipe, the pipe sheered. Fortunately
the sea cock was closed but it doesn’t require much imagination . . .
a bung: that's the wooden conical thing not the porridge
Most
of us are used to the idea that we can dial 999 and have a paramedic with us
very quickly then medical emergency is not something we regularly plan for or
think about. At times this year Swan
will be more than 20 hours from shore.
In fact even if she is only a few hours from harbour then it could still
be a long few hours. Again the regulatory
framework requires the carriage of certain medical stores. These are ordered through a local chemist who
is used to supplying boats of all type.
The medicines arrived shortly after I did, unsorted and in a big bag. Thus far my main interaction with medical
matters on board has been to discard out of date medical stores and to note that
reorganisation was needed.
I need to be
able to tell someone to get the burns pack or the minor injuries 1st
aid without having to sort through the indigestion tablets and cough medicines.
So I feel much more comfortable but there is still some work to do an boxing it up.
I want to close with two thoughts.
The
first is that the Swan has always complied with her legal responsibilities to
carry medical stores. So too did the majority
of our MPs when they claimed their expenses.
We oft heard them say that their claims were within the rules and
legal. Equally we know that what they
did was wrong. Tax loop wholes might be
legal but we regale about transgression of a moral responsibility. So my moral responsibility with the medical
stores didn’t end with compliance with the regulations, it extends to being
able to do my absolute best for any injured person, whether it’s having
tweezers (which aren’t part of the legal requirement) to remove a splinter or
ready access to the flamazine which is.
So compliance is necessary but not sufficient.
I hope that we won’t need the flamazine or the bungs and most people who
sail on this boat won’t ever know what it took to get them organised but I will
sleep a little easier and know that tomorrow morning when we slip I have done
my best to prepare for a medical (and other) emergency and not just fulfil a
legal requirement or hope that it will be OK but I also know that the sea and
life can never be made completely safe.
I was sorry to hear about Andrew 'Bart' Simpson's death in a sailing accident and - as you know - I am not a sailor.
ReplyDeleteWith the accident reporting, I always feel the need to report near misses is underestimated. I've seen a 'safety pyramid' that suggests for every one fatality, there will be 10 serious accidents, 100 minor injuries, 1,000 accidents with no injury and 10,000 near misses. However, very few people report near misses, or even accidents that don't result in an injury, so it ends up virtually impossible to work out how to prevent the one fatality simply because there isn't enough data to do the analysis. I think that's why we end up with all the regulation - it's the easiest way to ensure people have, at the least, made some preparations in case of an accident.
I do hope the school's programme runs without incident!
Thanks Izzy, it's an interesting statistic. I suspect that most systems could not cope with 10,000 near miss reports and wading through them might not reduce the accident rate but would increase the bureaucracy and number of "safety initiatives". That said and as you will discern, I do believe that near misses need to be acted upon and not simply shrugged off. I also think that an understated enhancement to safety is the "buddy buddy" system with an emphasis on proactively keeping each other safe. Encouraging people to take responsibility for each other and not just themselves is, I believe, more important than any number of safety manuals or briefings.
ReplyDeletenice bungs!
ReplyDelete